These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Presurgical mapping with functional MRI: comparative study with transcranial magnetic stimulation and intraoperative mapping].
    Author: Kaminogo M, Morikawa M, Ishimaru H, Ochi M, Onizuka M, Shirakawa Y, Takahashi H, Shibata S.
    Journal: No Shinkei Geka; 1999 May; 27(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 10363255.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The accuracy of preoperative mappings in patients with brain tumors near the central sulcus using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or transcranical magnetic stimulation (TCS) was evaluated by comparative reference to intraoperative mapping. METHODS: The thumb movement was evoked by TCS for the mapping of the motor cortex. After the placement of the marker determined by TCS on the scalp, fMRI under motor tasks consisting of repetitive grasping was performed. For motor cortex activation, an axial oblique plane to maximize gray matter sampling in the rolandic cortex was employed in order to compare these different mapping techniques more precisely. Sixteen patients with brain tumors were included in this study. RESULTS: In nine patients, fMRI disclosed activation in one restricted gyrus or in the localized area around one restricted sulcus. Of these nine patients, preoperative TCS mapping corresponded closely with fMRI in six, while in the remaining three, the TCS marker fell between 1 and 2 cm apart from the fMRI-activated area. However, in these three patients, intraoperative electrocortical stimulation corresponded with the preoperative mapping with fMRI. In six patients, contigucus two gyri were activated by motor tasks. The TCS marker was disclosed on one of the two activated gyri. Of these six patients, the position of the TCS marker and fMRI-activated site corresponded with each other in four cases. They were found on the same gyrus but there was 1.0-2.0 cm distance between them in two cases. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential was monitored in two of these six cases. They corresponded well with the mapping by fMRI and TCS together. In only one patient, no significant activation area was obtained by fMRI because of excessive head motion during motor tasks. The TCS marker in this patient was identical with intraoperative electro-cortical stimulation mapping. CONCLUSION: For presurgical planning in patients with brain tumor near the central sulcus, comparative evaluation with fMRI and TCS is applicable and provides accurate functional mapping.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]