These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Low density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B metabolism: comparison of two methods to establish kinetic parameters.
    Author: Parhofer KG, Barrett PH, Schwandt P.
    Journal: Atherosclerosis; 1999 May; 144(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 10381289.
    Abstract:
    Elevated plasma cholesterol concentrations represent a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Low density lipoprotein (LDL)-apolipoprotein (apo) B plays a key role in this process. Metabolic parameters of LDL-apoB such as fractional catabolic rate (FCR) and production rate help to understand the underlying pathomechanisms of elevated LDL-apoB and are usually determined with tracer studies (gold-standard). However, these parameters can also be calculated from the rebound of plasma LDL-apoB concentration following a perturbation such as apheresis, if it is assumed that the perturbation itself does not affect metabolic parameters. LDL-apoB metabolism was determined using two methods in eight hyperlipoproteinemic patients (47 +/- 15 years, body mass index (BMI) 27.5 +/- 4.1 kg/m): (a) by endogenous labeling using D3-leucine (bolus 5 mg/kg) as tracer and multicompartmental modeling; and (b) by fitting a monoexponential equation to LDL-apoB rebound concentration data following apheresis. LDL-apoB metabolic parameters determined using the two methods (mean +/- S.D.; FCR-tracer: 0.18 +/- 0.07 per day, FCR-rebound: 0.27 +/- 0.25 per day; production-tracer: 12.0 +/- 3.9 mg/kg per day; production-rebound: 15.2 +/- 8.0 mg/kg per day) were not correlated, were not concordant (intraclass correlation coefficient), and were not significantly different. Furthermore, only in five of the eight patients the rebound analysis predicted LDL-apoB steady-state concentrations that were within 20% of observed steady-state concentrations. These results indicate that parameters derived from LDL-apoB mass rebound following apheresis cannot be used as a surrogate for parameters established with tracer methodology probably because the assumption that apheresis does not affect metabolic parameters of LDL-apoB may not be true in all patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]