These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in-use evaluation of the high-level disinfection capabilities of Cidex PA.
    Author: Vesley D, Melson J, Stanley P.
    Journal: Gastroenterol Nurs; 1999; 22(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 10382415.
    Abstract:
    Most endoscopy clinics use 2% glutaraldehyde as a high-level disinfectant for reprocessing flexible endoscopes. However, even with contact times greater than 30 minutes, survival of organisms has been documented. We compared the high-level disinfection capabilities of glutaraldehyde (45-minute immersion) with a new peracetic acid germicide (20- to 25-minute immersion). Channels, valve housings, and outer sheaths were sampled to quantify bioburden levels after a patient procedure, after manual cleaning, and after disinfection. Total mean bioburden after clinical use was greater than 6 log10 colony-forming units (CFU). Manual cleaning reduced the bioburden by means of 4.7 log10 CFU (gastroscopes) and 6.2 log10 CFU (colonoscopes). High-level disinfection with the new product was achieved in five of six (product stressed by EPA Reuse Test) and 7 of 10 (product stressed by dilution and organic load) successfully disinfected endoscopes, whereas glutaraldehyde achieved it in 4 of 10 (product stressed by dilution and organic load). We conclude that the new peracetic acid product (20- and 25-minute contact time) is at least as effective as glutaraldehyde (45-minute contact time) for reducing the bioburden of vegetative aerobic organisms in endoscopes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]