These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In-vitro activity of levofloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone: evaluation against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis.
    Author: Kitzis MD, Goldstein FW, Miegi M, Acar JF.
    Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 1999 Jun; 43 Suppl C():21-6. PubMed ID: 10404333.
    Abstract:
    The in-vitro activity of levofloxacin was studied against 10 beta-lactamase-negative and 93 beta-lactamase-positive Moraxella catarrhalis isolates, and 65 beta-lactamase-negative and 35 beta-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae isolates. The MICs of levofloxacin were determined by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar (with the addition of 5% horse blood for M. catarrhalis) or on Haemophilus Test Medium for H. influenzae, and were compared with those of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin, as well as pefloxacin and D-ofloxacin for M. catarrhalis. The fluoroquinolones showed similar activity against isolates of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, irrespective of beta-lactamase production. Levofloxacin (MIC50/90 0.06 mg/L) was 64 times more active against M. catarrhalis than D-ofloxacin (MIC50/90 4/8 mg/L) and twice as active as ofloxacin (MIC50/90 0.125 mg/L). Ciprofloxacin had an MIC50/90 of 0.03/0.06 mg/L and sparfloxacin showed an MIC50/90 of 0.015 mg/L against M. catarrhalis irrespective of the resistance phenotype of the isolates. Against H. influenzae, levofloxacin was twice as active as ofloxacin (MIC90 values 0.03 mg/L versus 0.06 mg/L), while the MIC90s of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin were both 0.015 mg/L. Our results therefore suggest that levofloxacin has potential for treating respiratory tract infections caused by H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]