These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Rectal carcinoma. Optimizing therapy by local excision].
    Author: Heintz A, Mörschel M, Junginger T.
    Journal: Zentralbl Chir; 1999; 124(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 10420531.
    Abstract:
    The results of local excision and radical surgery in patients with T1-carcinomas of the rectum were compared. In a retrospective study (1.1.1985-1.7.1997) the results obtained in 107 patients with T1-rectal carcinoma ("low risk" T1: n = 83, "high risk" T1: n = 24) undergoing local excision or radical surgical therapy were compared. The complication rate in patients undergoing local excision was 3.3% (2/60) and ranged at 19% (9/47) in the group treated with radical surgery. Two out of 47 patients (4.2%) died after radical resection; there were no deaths after local excision. With regard to the actuarial 5-year survival rate, in the group with "low risk" T1 carcinoma no difference was observed between patients treated with local excision (79%) or radical resection (81%) (p = 0.72). In patients with "high risk" T1 carcinoma lymph node metastases were identified in 4 out of 11 patients undergoing radical resection (36%). 4 out of 13 patients with "high risk" T1 carcinoma treated by local excision developed recurrences, while none of the patients undergoing primary radical surgery had a recurrence. This underlines the necessity of radical surgery in "high risk" T1-carcinomas. Local excision for the treatment of "low risk" T1-carcinoma is associated with a significantly lower complication rate than the performance of a radical surgical therapy. There is no difference in five-year-survival between local and radical surgical therapy in patients with "low risk" T1 carcinoma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]