These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A comparison of the onset and clinical duration of high doses of cisatracurium and rocuronium. Author: Lighthall GK, Jamieson MA, Katolik J, Brock-Utne JG. Journal: J Clin Anesth; 1999 May; 11(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 10434218. Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the onset and clinical duration of cisatracurium and rocuronium in equipotent doses in balanced opioid/isoflurane anesthesia. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 40 healthy patients scheduled for elective surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent anesthesia induction with thiopental or propofol with a cisatracurium intubating dose of either 0.15 or 0.2 mg/kg or a rocuronium dose of either 0.9 or 1.2 mg/kg. These doses correspond to three and four times the ED95 dose. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The onset time and time to 25% recovery of baseline first twitch in a train-of-four were determined using an accelerometric sensor. Rocuronium had a faster onset time that cisatracurium at equipotent doses (3 x ED95: 134 vs. 220 sec respectively, and at 4 x ED95: 95 vs. 162 sec). Recovery tended to be faster, but not statistically different for cisatracurium compared to rocuronium. CONCLUSIONS: With equipotent intubating doses of rocuronium and cisatracurium, rocuronium produces a more rapid onset of muscle relaxation. The data suggest a tendency toward more rapid clinical recovery of cisatracurium compared to equipotent doses of rocuronium, although these differences were not statistically significant.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]