These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Age-of-onset classification of conduct disorder: reliability and validity in a prospective cohort study.
    Author: Sanford M, Boyle MH, Szatmari P, Offord DR, Jamieson E, Spinner M.
    Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1999 Aug; 38(8):992-9. PubMed ID: 10434491.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To test in a prospective clinical cohort study the reliability and validity of the age-of-onset subtyping of conduct disorder. METHOD: Participants were adolescents referred to psychiatric clinics who met DSM-III-R criteria for conduct disorder by structured diagnostic interview. Age of onset was the reported age of the first conduct disorder symptom. The reliability of age-of-onset report was tested by assessing agreement within informant on interviews 2 to 4 weeks apart. Age-of-onset groups were compared within informant on rates of correlates and symptom and social functioning outcomes over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: The reliability of age-of-onset report was low (kappa of 0.1 and 0.4 by adolescent and parent informant, respectively). Although the early-onset group had elevated rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, family disadvantage, and aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behaviors at inclusion, growth curve analysis showed that age-of-onset subtyping had no predictive validity. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of ascertainment of age of onset of antisocial behavior requires further study. While age-of-onset subtyping has heuristic value with respect to the study of the causal pathways to conduct disorder, it is premature to use this system in clinic settings.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]