These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [A comparative study of a thick and standard loop in transurethral resection of the prostate].
    Author: Hashimoto H, Tsugawa M, Nasu Y, Kumon H, Murata T, Takeda K, Irie S, Shirasaki Y, Akaeda T, Ohashi T, Kondo K, Takamoto H, Mizuno A, Kobuke M, Nishi M.
    Journal: Hinyokika Kiyo; 1999 Jun; 45(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 10442280.
    Abstract:
    We compared the safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with a thick loop and with a standard loop. We compared 36 consecutive men (median age, 70 years) with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperlasia (BPH) treated by TURP with a thick loop to a cohort of 36 men (median age, 72 years) treated by TURP with a standard loop. The safety parameters of evaluation included the operative time, blood loss, chronological changes in serum sodium, and complications. The efficacy parameters of evaluation included International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life assessment, peak urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume. The operative time (median, 49.5 versus 43.5 minutes), blood loss (median, 179 versus 127 ml), and change in serum sodium (median, -4.0 versus -6.0 mEq/L) were not significantly greater in the thick loop group than in the standard loop group, respectively. There were no major complications in either group. Clinically significant improvement was observed in all efficacy parameters in both groups, with no difference between the two groups. These results suggest that TURP with a thick loop is not necessarily superior to TURP with a standard loop in terms of decreasing the blood loss and decreasing the operative time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]