These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Clinical experience with the Sp[hy adjustable valve in the treatment of adult hydrocephalus. A series of 147 cases]. Author: Bret P, Guyotat J, Ricci AC, Mottolese C, Jouanneau E. Journal: Neurochirurgie; 1999 May; 45(2):98-108; discussion 108-9. PubMed ID: 10448649. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the advantages, results and drawbacks of the Sophy adjustable valve (SV) in the treatment of hydrocephalus in the adult. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty-seven adult hydrocephalic patients (mean age = 64.5 years) shunted with a SV between 1990 and 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. Etiologies of hydrocephalus were: "normal pressure" chronic hydrocephalus (NPH) in 124 and tumoral hydrocephalus with intracranial hypertension in 23 patients. One-hundred fifty shunts were established in 147 patients: 14 ventriculoatrial and 136 ventriculoperitoneal shunts. The initial pressure settings of the SV were: high pressure: 12 times (8%), medium pressure: 136 times (90.6%) and low pressure: 2 times (1.3%). RESULTS: Sixteen patients were lost to follow-up. Two patients died within hours following the procedure. So, the results were analyzed in the 129 remaining patients, with a follow-up of 16.7 months (+/- 17.8). Three patients died from shunted-related causes (2.3%). Eighty-four patients had good results (65%), 25 had fair results (19.5%) and 20 failed to improve or deteriorated (15.5%) after shunting. Fifty-three reoperations were performed in 44 patients (34%), including 37 procedures for mechanical obstruction and 6 for septic complications. Subdural effusions (SDE) occurred in 16 patients (12.5%): 10 surgical evacuations were required in 7 patients; 8 patients were successfully treated using uprating of the SV pressure alone; one was managed conservatively. Fifty-eight pressure readjustments were performed in 47 patients. The pressure settings were uprated 28 times in patients showing clinical or computerized tomographic (CT) features suggesting overdrainage; 20 of those proved to be successful (71.5%). The pressure settings were lowered 30 times in patients showing a lack of improvement after shunting, attributed to underdrainage; only 12 of those proved to be successful (40%). Spontaneous changes of the pressure settings were observed in 14 patients (10.8%). After a MRI exposure, SV pressure changes were observed in 64% of patients. DISCUSSION: The technological refinements that have been proposed to eliminate the overdrainage which occurs in most usual cerebrospinal fluid shunts are reviewed. The SV valve has allowed non-invasive adjustments of its opening pressure in patients showing complications ascribed to inappropriate drainage. The need for additional surgery was eliminated in 20% to 25% of patients of the present series. Because of frequent spontaneous and magnetic resonance-induced pressure changes, the need for repeated controls of valve pressure is to be reemphasized. CONCLUSION: This experience suggests that the SV represents a substantial improvement over standard fixed-pressure valves.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]