These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Findings and outcome of revision lumbar disc surgery.
    Author: Ozgen S, Naderi S, Ozek MM, Pamir MN.
    Journal: J Spinal Disord; 1999 Aug; 12(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 10451043.
    Abstract:
    One hundred fourteen patients (64 men, 50 women) with prior lumbar disc surgery underwent a reexploration for intractable back and/or leg pain. The finding in revision surgery included disc herniation in 89 cases (78%), epidural fibrosis in 14 cases (12.2%), adhesive arachnoiditis in 4 cases (3.5%), isolated lateral spinal stenosis in 3 cases (2.6%), and iatrogenic instability in 4 cases (3.5%). Review of operative reports of patients who underwent a first operation in our institute revealed that seven cases (12.5%) had a second laminotomy without a discectomy in addition to the previous laminotomy and discectomy performed in the same session. Fifty-six of the patients with disc hemiation in revision surgery had a true recurrence. Disc hemiation was protruded in 38 cases (42.8%), extruded in 44 cases (49.4%), and sequestrated in 7 cases (7.8%). The outcome was assessed using Prolo's functional and economic scale. According to Prolo's scale, a good outcome was detected in 79 cases (69.2%), moderate in 22 (19.2%), and a poor outcome was detected in 13 cases (11.4%). The best outcome was achieved in patients with disc hemiation. It is concluded that recurrent disc disease is the most important cause of reexploration. This fact dictates a careful preoperative workup and discectomy in the first intervention. The likelihood of occurrence of disc herniation in the negative laminotomy level (i.e., laminotomy without discectomy procedure) also requires a careful preoperative radiologic workup before lumbar disc surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]