These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The comparison of cyclopentolate and atropine in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia by means of retinoscopy, autorefractometry and biometric lens thickness.
    Author: Celebi S, Aykan U.
    Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Aug; 77(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 10463415.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to compare the cycloplegic effect of cyclopentolate HCI 1% and atropine sulphate 1% in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia by means of retinoscopy, autorefractometer and the measurement of lens thickness by biometry. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with refractive accommodative esotropia aged from 5 to 10 (mean 6.8+/-1.4), had a deviation under 10 prism diopters, and underwent retinoscopic, autorefractometric and biometric study in dry and wet conditions. RESULTS: The retinoscopic, autorefractometric and biometric findings of the right eye were 5.10+/-1.21 diopter (D), 5.03+/-1.20 D, 3.43+/-0.16 mm with cyclopentolate, and 5.2+/-1.2 D, 5.2+/-1.2 D, 3.4+/-0.1 mm with atropine. In the left eye, the measurements were 5.2+/-1.4 D, 5.1+/-1.4 D, 3.5+/-0.2 mm with cyclopentolate, and 5.3+/-1.2 D, 5.20+/-1.3 D, 3.4+/-0.2 mm with atropine, respectively. When these obtained data were compared by the Student's t test no statistical significance was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the cyclopentolate cycloplegia applied to the patients with refractive accommodative esotropia is sufficient to produce good cycloplegia, with an effect similar to atropine.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]