These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Clonogenic potential and phenotypic analysis of CD34+ cells mobilized by different chemotherapy regimens. Author: Cesana C, Regazzi E, Garau D, Caramatti C, Mangoni L, Rizzoli V. Journal: Haematologica; 1999 Sep; 84(9):771-8. PubMed ID: 10477448. Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Since limited data concerning quantitative and qualitative differences of CD34+ cells collected after different mobilization schedules are available, we investigated phenotype, proliferative capacity and primitive progenitor cell content of CD34+ cells mobilized with four different regimens. DESIGN AND METHODS: The number, phenotype, and progenitor cell content of CD34+ cells were investigated in 46 patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide (CY) 7 g/m(2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 5 microg/kg) (CY7+G-CSF) (n=16), CY 4 g/m(2) plus G-CSF (CY4+G-CSF) (n=8), IVE [ifosphamide (2.5 g/m(2) for 3 d), etoposide (150 mg/m(2) for 3 d), epirubicin (100 mg/m(2) on day 1)] plus G-CSF (IVE+G-CSF) (n=9), or G-CSF (10 microg/kg) alone (n=13). RESULTS: The number of CD34+ cells collected per liter of processed blood was significantly higher in the CY7+G-CSF group than in the CY4+G-CSF and G-CSF groups (p </= .005), but not the IVE+G-CSF group. As compared to patients in the CY4+G-CSF group, those mobilized with CY7+G-CSF and IVE+G-CSF produced significantly lower percentages of CD34+ cells lacking CD38, CD33, CD45RA, and HLA-DR (p </= .016, at least). In addition, CY4+G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells had a significantly higher plating efficiency than the cells mobilized in other ways (p </= r .036). In the G-CSF group, colony-forming cells and long-term culture-initiating cells were significantly lower than in the CY groups (p </= .0014 and </= 013, respectively). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that: (i) different mobilization regimens allow the collection of CD34+ cells with distinct phenotypic and proliferative features; (ii) evaluation of the absolute number of CD34+ cells by itself is not a reliable indicator of the clonogenic content of blood mobilized with different chemotherapy regimens; (iii) because of the substantial impact that chemotherapy regimens have on the quantity and quality of collected CD34+ cells, anticancer effects and optimal blood progenitor cell yields should be evaluated for each chemotherapy schedule.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]