These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of capillary zone and immunosubtraction with agarose gel and immunofixation electrophoresis for detecting and identifying monoclonal gammopathies.
    Author: Litwin CM, Anderson SK, Philipps G, Martins TB, Jaskowski TD, Hill HR.
    Journal: Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Sep; 112(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 10478148.
    Abstract:
    Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and immuno-subtraction electrophoresis (ISE) were evaluated for ability to detect and immunotype monoclonal proteins, compared with agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), respectively. Six hundred seventeen serum samples were analyzed with CZE and AGE to determine sensitivity and specificity in detecting IFE-confirmed monoclonal gammopathies. Both techniques detected all monoclonal spikes due to IgM (n = 8), IgG (n = 38), and free light chains (n = 3). Agarose gel electrophoresis, however, detected only 11 of 14 (79%) IgA monoclonal spikes detected with CZE. In a second study, 78 serum samples, 48 of which had a monoclonal gammopathy confirmed with IFE, were evaluated with ISE. Only 60% to 75% of the monoclonal gammopathies were correctly immunotyped with ISE by 4 readers blinded to the IFE immunotype. Thus CZE was more sensitive than AGE in detecting low concentrations of monoclonal proteins, but ISE is less accurate than IFE in determining the immunotype of the monoclonal gammopathy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]