These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Synthetic protein treated versus heparin coated cardiopulmonary bypass surfaces: similar clinical results and minor biochemical differences.
    Author: Wimmer-Greinecker G, Matheis G, Martens S, Oremek G, Abdel-Rahman U, Moritz A.
    Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Aug; 16(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 10485423.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have gained more attention due to increased interest in coronary artery bypass grafting without CPB. The impact of heparin coating of CPB circuits has been discussed controversially. The present study examines if the treatment of the oxygenator surface with a synthetic protein may serve as an alternative to a completely heparin coated circuit. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with CPB were randomly assigned to completely heparin coated circuits or synthetic protein treated oxygenators in a double blind protocol, focussing on the inflammatory reaction resulting in membrane damage, coagulation changes and markers of cerebral injury or dysfunction. Treatment groups did not differ as to preoperative demographics, and intraoperative clinical data. Patients with any neurologic disease or risk factors for cerebral dysfunction were not included in the study. RESULTS: Postoperative clinical data did not differ between groups. Both surface treatments resulted in similar coagulation activation, hyperfibrinolysis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Platelet count displayed a difference in favour of the heparin coated group (P = 0.029). Increased leukocyte activation reflected by rising myeloperoxidase concentrations on CPB was present in both synthetic protein and heparin coating groups. Interleukins 6 and 8 reacted similarly, but interleukin 8 increased significantly more (P = 0.0061) at the end of surgery in patients treated with protein treated oxygenators. The same pattern was observed for complement activation as determined by total complement complex (P = 0.006). Both surface changes resulted in moderately increased S-100B protein and neuron specific enolase, without difference between groups. Both markers did not reach concentrations associated with clinical manifestation of cerebral injury. CONCLUSIONS: These results in routine patients with short bypass time, imply that protein treated oxygenators are associated with a limited increase of biochemical markers similar to heparin coating. However, significantly lower interleukin 8 release and complement activation can be achieved by heparin coating. The protein treatment is a standard feature of the oxygenator examined in both groups. It is not associated with additional cost and therefore appropriate for use in routine patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]