These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Left ventricular performance, ventriculo-arterial coupling and mechanical output in hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy].
    Author: Nitenberg A, Antony I, Loiseau A.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1999 Aug; 92(8):965-70. PubMed ID: 10486647.
    Abstract:
    Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a physiological process of adaptation of the heart to mechanical load increase. Despite depression of left ventricular (LV) contractile performance, work efficiency is preserved and ventriculoarterial coupling is almost normal in hypertensive patients with LVH. To assess the differences between patients with and without LVH, LV contractile performance, the ventriculoarterial coupling and mechanical efficiency were compared in 2 groups of hypertensive patients with similar body surface area and arterial pressures, 23 without LVH (group 1) and 30 with LVH (group 2) and compared to data of 20 normotensive subjects. Left ventricular angiography coupled with simultaneous recording of pressures with micromanometer were used to determine end-systolic stress-to-volume ratio (ESSVR), end-systolic elastance (Ees), effective arterial elastance (Ea), external work (EW) and pressure-volume area (PVA). Left ventricular contractile performance assessed by Ees/100 g myocardial mass and EESVR were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1.23 +/- 0.28 vs 1.89 +/- 0.48 mmHg/mL/100 g and 6.22 +/- 1.07 vs 9.56 +/- 0.97 g/cm2/mL/m2, respectively, both p < 0.0001, control subjects: 1.47 +/- 0.41 and 6.97 +/- 1.22, respectively). Ventriculoarterial coupling evaluated through Ea/Ees ratio (0.51 +/- 0.05 in group 1 vs 0.53 +/- 0.08 in group 2, 0.49 +/- 0.09 in control subjects), and work efficiency evaluated through EW/PVA ratio (0.80 +/- 0.02 in group 1 vs 0.78 +/- 0.03 in group 2, 0.80 +/- 0.03 in control subjects), were similar in the 2 groups and were comparable to control subject values. In conclusion, this study shows that ventriculoarterial coupling and work efficiency are comparable in hypertensive patients with and without LVH. These results suggest that in patients without LVH the matching between left ventricle and arterial receptor is preserved through an enhancement of myocardial contractility which is energetically costly. Conversely, LVH seems to be a useful adaptation which minimizes the energetical cost of high pressure generation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]