These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Placenta accreta in Kuwait: does a discrepancy exist between fundal and praevia accreta?
    Author: Makhseed M, Moussa MA.
    Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1999 Oct; 86(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 10509784.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare maternal and neonatal outcome in relation to site of placenta accreta by stratifying the site of placenta accreta into upper and lower uterine segment implantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen cases of placenta accreta which were reported in the Maternity Hospital of Kuwait over 11 years from January 1981 to July 1993 - (1990 and 1991 excluded) were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital medical records. RESULTS: The incidence of placenta accreta was 9.8 per 100,000 deliveries. The rate of accreta in patients with placenta praevia was 880 per 100,000 placenta praevia, compared to a rate of 5 accreta per 100,000 placenta implanting in the upper uterine segment. There were no differences between accreta found in the upper segment and lower segment for maternal and neonatal mortality, maternal complication, past obstetric history and possibility of conserving the uterus. Significant differences were found in the birth weight, gestational age at birth, antenatal symptoms, time of diagnosis and mode of delivery when accreta was stratified by site of implantation. CONCLUSION: Placenta praevia is a definite risk factor for placenta accreta. Combined abnormal penetration of placenta as in accreta and abnormality in site as in praevia does have a significant clinical implications.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]