These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement.
    Author: Lukl J, Doupal V, Sovová E, Lubena L.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1284-91. PubMed ID: 10527009.
    Abstract:
    This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in 211 patients [age 71.1 6 10.6 years (mean 6 SD)] by means of maximum exercise test in order to determine the indication for rate-responsive pacing before primary pacemaker implantation (147 patients) or pacemaker replacement (64 patients). There were 112 (53%) patients with second- or third-degree AV block, 63 (30%) with sick sinus syndrome, and 36 (17%) with chronic atrial fibrillation. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as maximum heart rate lower than age-adjusted norm calculated by the formula: 0.7x(220 - age) and its significance as the difference between the two rates. The overall incidence of chronotropic incompetence was 42%. The incidence was significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation (67%, P<0.0005) and sick sinus syndrome (49%, P<0.012) than in those with AV block (30%). The mean difference between maximum heart rate and the age-adjusted norm was 18% (range 2%-63%). The mean difference was significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation (27%, range 8-63%) than in those with sick sinus syndrome (19%, range 2%-45%, P<0.01), or with AV block (12%, range 6%-26%, P<0.000001). The rate-responsive pacemakers were implanted in 44% of 211 patients studied and in 43% of 196 patients excluded from the study due to the apparent (contra)indication of rate-responsive pacing (NS). Thus, chronotropic incompetence seems to be common in the pacemaker patient population. The highest incidence and significance was found in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Systematic evaluation of chronotropic competence can double the rate of implantation of rate-responsive pacemakers; however, further studies are needed to clarify relation between the significance of chronotropic incompetence and functional benefit of rate-responsive pacing.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]