These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Physiological and metabolic responses of female games and endurance athletes to prolonged, intermittent, high-intensity running at 30 degrees and 16 degrees C ambient temperatures.
    Author: Morris JG, Nevill ME, Williams C.
    Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Jan; 81(1-2):84-92. PubMed ID: 10552271.
    Abstract:
    Eight female games players (GP) and eight female endurance athletes (EA) ran intermittently at high-intensity and for prolonged periods in hot (30 degrees C) and moderate (16 degrees C) ambient temperatures. The subjects performed a two-part (A, B) test based on repeated 20-m shuttle runs. Part A comprised 60 m of walking, a maximal 15-m sprint, 60 m of cruising (90% maximal oxygen uptake, VO(2max)) and 60 m of jogging (45% VO(2max)) repeated for 75 min with a 3-min rest every 15 min. Part B involved an exercise and rest pattern of 60-s running at 100% VO(2max) and 60-s rest which was continued until fatigue. Although the GP and EA did not respond differently in terms of distances completed, performance was 25 (SEM 4)% less (main effect trial, P < 0.01) in the hot (HT) compared with the moderate trial (MT). Sprints of 15 m took longer to complete in the heat (main effect, trial, P < 0.01), and sprint performance declined during HT but not MT (interaction, trial x time, P < 0.01). A very high correlation was found between the rate of rise in rectal temperature in HT and the distance completed [GP, r =-0.94, P < 0. 01; EA (n = 7), r = -0.93, P < 0.01]. Blood lactate [La(-) ](b) and plasma ammonia [NH(3)](p1) concentrations were higher for GP than EA, but were similar in HT and MT [La(-) ](b), HT: GP vs EA, 8.0 (SEM 0. 9) vs 4.9 (SEM 1.1) mmol x l(-1); MT: GP vs EA, 8.0 (SEM 1.3) vs 4.4 (SEM 1.2) mmol x l(-1); interaction, group x time, P < 0.01; [NH(3)](p1), HT: GP vs EA, 70.1 (SEM 12.7) vs 43.2 (SEM 6.1) mmol x l(-1); MT: GP vs EA, 76.8 (SEM 8.8) vs 32.5 (SEM 3.8) micromol x l(-1); interaction, group x time, P < 0.01. Ad libitum water consumption was higher in HT [HT: GP vs EA, 18.9 (SEM 2.9) vs 13.5 (SEM 1.7) ml x kg(-1) x h(-1); MT: GP vs EA, 12.7 (SEM 3.7) vs 8.5 (SEM 1.5) ml x kg(-1) x h(-1); main effect, group, n.s.; main effect, trial, P < 0.01]. These results would suggest that elevated body temperature is probably the key factor limiting performance of prolonged, intermittent, high-intensity running when the ambient temperature is high, but not because of its effect on the metabolic responses to exercise.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]