These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Contact lens wear after photorefractive keratectomy: comparison between rigid gas permeable and soft contact lenses. Author: Lim L, Siow KL, Chong JS, Tan DT. Journal: CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 10555738. Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine if rigid gas permeable (RGP) or soft contact lenses can be successfully worn after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct residual refractive errors. METHODS: Patients with residual stable ametropia after PRK were fit with RGP or soft lenses. Manifest refraction, corneal topography, and keratometry were performed, and post-PRK corneal haze was graded during the study visits. Contact lens fit characteristics and comfort were assessed. Lens centration, visual quality, and ocular surface status were graded, and visual acuity with contact lenses was charted. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were recruited for RGP lens fitting. The mean refractive error post-PRK was +0.80 D +/- 2.03 (range: -3.50 to+3.00 D). The mean contact lens power was -3.90 D +/- 2.03 (range: 0 to -7.00 D), and the mean contact lens base curve was 7.88 mm +/-0.16. A significant positive tear film at the site of the central ablation was noted, contributing to excessive minus lens power in all cases. Despite mild to moderate lens instability and de-centration, 14 patients reported excellent visual quality with the lenses, and pre-PRK best-corrected acuity was achieved in all patients. Twenty-five percent (4 of 16) of the patients were able to wear the lenses all day. Eleven patients were recruited for soft contact lens fitting-five from the RGP trial. The mean refractive error post-PRK was -0.64 D +/- 2.01 (range: -3.50 to +1.75D). The mean contact lens power was -0.60 D +/- 2.07 (range: -3.75 to +2.5 D), and the mean contact lens base curve was 8.33 mm +/- 0.42. Eight patients were corrected with lenses to their pre-PRK best-corrected acuity, and nine patients reported excellent visual quality with the lenses. All the patients had excellent lens centration. Thirty-six percent (four of 11) of patients were wearing the lenses all day. CONCLUSIONS: Fitting RGP lenses after PRK results in good visual acuity but may be associated with mild to moderate lens instability and decentration. Soft contact lens fitting also results in good visual acuity. Soft lenses were better tolerated by the subjects in our study because of improved lens centration and stability.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]