These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Author: Cheng RF, Hernandez E, Anderson LL, Heller PB, Shank R.
    Journal: J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) and determine the most appropriate evaluation of these patients. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1993 and 1995, 44,217 Papanicolaou smears were evaluated at Allegheny University Hospitals, Medical College of Pennsylvania Campus. There were 108 (0.24%) cases of AGUS smears during that time. No clinical information was available for 14 patients, and 19 were lost to follow-up. The charts of the remaining 75 cases were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Tissue specimens were available for 62 of the 75 patients. There were 26 (42%) with no significant histopathologic findings, 13 (21%) with polyps, 5 (8%) cases of endometrial hyperplasia, 2 (3%) with endometrial adenocarcinoma, 12 (19%) with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), 1 (2%) with adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix, 2 (3%) with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and 1 (2%) case of metastatic breast cancer. The total number of patients with significant histopathology other than polyps was 23 (37%). The median age of the patients was 49 years. There were more cases of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer (19%) in women 49 years or older than in younger women; only one (3%) case of endometrial hyperplasia was detected in the younger age group (P = .057). Patients who underwent more-aggressive evaluation (colposcopy and biopsies plus endometrial sampling, cone biopsy or hysterectomy) had greater numbers of abnormal histopathologic findings (55%) than patients who underwent endometrial sampling only (21%) or those who underwent colposcopy and biopsy only (33%). This difference approaches statistical significance (P = .057). A significant proportion of patients with a history of CIN and a cytologic diagnosis of AGUS were found to have CIN (47%), while 8% of those with no history of CIN were found to have CIN (P = .002). Fifty percent of patients with a history of cancer (all had breast cancer) and AGUS had abnormal histopathology. Patients with a subclassification of AGUS "favor neoplasia" had a greater proportion of significant histopathology (72%) as compared to AGUS "unspecified" (26%) and AGUS "favor reactive" (20%) (P = .003). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of women with a cytologic diagnosis of AGUS have abnormal histopathology. Heightened awareness should be raised in patients with AGUS and a history of CIN or cancer and in those with the AGUS subclassification "favor neoplasia."
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]