These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Complications associated with the use of first generation Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component after a mean follow-up of 7 years]. Author: Lecoq C, Rochwerger A, Curvale G, Groulier P. Journal: Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1999 Nov; 85(7):689-97. PubMed ID: 10612133. Abstract: MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hundred and twelve hip were studied in 107 patients with a mean follow-up of 7 years (range, 6-9 years). Harris and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip scores were used. The prosthetic components were evaluated using radiographic criteria. RESULTS: The mean Harris score was 91 (range, 34-100). The incidence of proximal pain was 3.7 p. 100 in anterior area and also 3.7 p. 100 in posterior area. Radiolucent lines were present in one acetabular zone in 28.5 p. 100 of cases, in two zones in 26 p. 100, in all three zones in 5.5 p. 100. No statistical significant corelation was identified relating pain and radiolucent lines. The mean rate of linear wear per year was 0.1 millimeter. A statistically significant corelation was identified relating a linear wear per year above 0.12 millimeter and the presence of radiolucent lines. A major polyethylene wear (from 2.75 to 3.5 millimeters) was found in 5 cases. One of them had an acetabular osteolysis. One acetabular liner was found unstable in the metal shell during a hip revision for a major wear. Two patients had a dislocation of the liner in the metal-back. Eight hips needed a revision surgery, always for a failure of the polyethylene liner, never for a loosening between the socket and the acétabulum. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The acetabular component bone fixation of this Harris-Galante prosthesis appears optimum. The polyethylene wear and the unstability between the polyethylene cup and the metal socket need to stop using this component. The fixation between his two parts have to be improved.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]