These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effects of slow-wave sleep (SWS) deprivation and time of night on behavioral performance upon awakening.
    Author: Ferrara M, De Gennaro L, Bertini M.
    Journal: Physiol Behav; ; 68(1-2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10627062.
    Abstract:
    The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of selective SWS deprivation on the motor and sensory motor performance impairment immediately after awakening from nocturnal sleep at different times of the night. Ten normal males slept for 6 consecutive nights in the laboratory: one adaptation, two baseline, two selective SWS deprivation, and one recovery night. During the last 4 nights performance was assessed four times: (a) before sleep, as a baseline measure; (b) within 30 s from the first nighttime awakening, after 2 h of sleep; (c) within 30 s from the second nighttime awakening, after 5 h of sleep; (d) within 30 s from the final morning awakening. After each awakening, following a 3-min cognitive test, a simple Auditory Reaction Time task (ART, about 5 min) and a Finger Tapping Task (FTT, 3 min) were administered. Median of Reaction Times (RT) and of Intertapping Intervals (ITI), 10% fastest RT, 10% slowest RT, and number of misses were considered as dependent variables. The selective SWS deprivation was very effective: SWS percentage during both the deprivation nights was close to zero. This strong manipulation of SWS amount interacted with time-of-night factors in influencing sleep inertia. The SWS deprivation procedure caused a worsening of behavioral performance during the deprivation nights. as well as upon the final awakening of the recovery night. Behavioral performance slowing upon awakening is accounted for by: (1) a general decrement in overall response speed (median of RT); (2) an "optimum response shift", i.e., a decrease in speed of the fastest responses; (3) an increase of lapsing, with more marked response delays resulting in a further decrease in response speed in the "lapse domain". Finally, our results do not support the existence of a circadian rhythm of sleep inertia linked to body temperature rhythm.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]