These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of the effects of nifedipine and nisoldipine on coronary vasoconstriction in the Langendorff-perfused rat heart.
    Author: Okada T, Izawa N, Nakamura T.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2000 Jan; 35(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 10630745.
    Abstract:
    By using Langendorff-perfused rat hearts, we compared the relaxant effects of two dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (nifedipine and nisoldipine) on the coronary vasculature. Hearts were perfused at a constant flow rate (13 ml/min), and the coronary perfusion pressure was monitored to assess vasoconstriction and relaxation. Administration of 5 nM endothelin significantly increased the perfusion pressure within 5 min, and it did not decrease during the subsequent 10-min washout period. Washout with 1 nM nisoldipine or 10 nM nifedipine almost completely normalized the perfusion pressure. Administration of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (100 microM), elevated the perfusion pressure at 5 min. When 1 nM nifedipine was added to the perfusate, it failed to decrease the pressure, but 10 and 100 nM nifedipine partly decreased it (96.4+/-8.2 and 87.0+/-8.8 mm Hg for 10 and 100 nM, respectively). Nisoldipine alleviated the pressure elevation almost completely at 10 nM (60.0+/-5.2 mm Hg). The vasodilatory effect of nisoldipine was also approximately 10 times more potent than that of nifedipine when coronary vasoconstriction was induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation. These results suggest that nisoldipine has a stronger effect than nifedipine at the organ level, which does not depend on the cause of coronary vasoconstriction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]