These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of Fluroshield with Delton fissure sealant: four year results.
    Author: Lygidakis NA, Oulis KI.
    Journal: Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):429-31. PubMed ID: 10633516.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention rate and the caries increment differences between a light cured, F releasing filled fissure sealant and a non-F nonfilled one. METHODS: The two different fissure sealants (Fluoroshield, Delton) were placed on all 4 caries-free first permanent molars of 112 children aged 7-8 years, under a half-mouth experimental design. All the children were seen in 6 month intervals where a preventive program, including regular topical fluoride application was applied. The sealants were not reapplied if they had been lost between examinations. RESULTS: After 48 months 162 teeth in the F sealant group and 162 in the conventional sealant group were evaluated. Regarding sealant retention, 124 teeth (77%) in the first group and 144 (89%) in the second were fully sealed, and 23 (14%) compared to 9 (6%) were partly sealed (P = 0.01). Regarding caries development, 14 teeth (9%) had developed caries in the first group and 19 (10%) in the second (P > 0.1). CONCLUSION: In a regular biannual preventing program including topical gel application, F-releasing filled sealant (Fluroshield) appears to have a declined full retention rate, after four years, when compared with a non-F nonfilled one (Delton). However, total sealant loss and caries increment was similar in both groups.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]