These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Secretory meningioma, a rare meningioma subtype with characteristic glandular differentation: an histological and immunohistochemical study of 9 cases.
    Author: Assi A, Declich P, Iacobellis M, Cozzi L, Tonnarelli G.
    Journal: Adv Clin Path; 1999 Jul; 3(3):47-53. PubMed ID: 10655573.
    Abstract:
    AIM: We studied the immunophenotype of 9 cases of secretory meningioma (SM), a rarely reported meningioma variant, characterized by small gland-like lumina filled with a PAS-positive, diastase-resistant substance. METHODS: Three samples of arachnoid tissue and 9 SMs were studied with a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) against cytokeratins (Ck) 7,8, 20, vimentin, EMA, CEA and the mucin epitopes sialyl-Tn, Tn, CA19.9, CA125, against the BerEP4 and CD15; 3 colonic adenocarcinomas metastatic to the brain and a case of meningioma with metastasis from a gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma were also studied with the same panel of MoAbs for comparison. RESULTS: The 3 samples of arachnoid cap cells were positive only for EMA and vimentin in the supportive stroma. All 9 SMs resulted Ck7+, Ck8+, Ck20-, EMA+, CEA and mucin epitopes+, confirming at an immunohistochemical level the glandular differentiation. Notable exceptions were the negativity for BerEP4 and CD15 antigens. Conversely, the 3 metastatic colonic adenocarcinomas to the brain were Ck7-, Ck8+, Ck20+, CEA and mucin epitopes+, BerEP4 and CD15+; the gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma metastatic to a meningioma showed the same immunophenotype as the other metastatic adenocarcinomas with the exception of BerEP4 negativity. CONCLUSION: The different pattern of cytokeratin expression (Ck7+/Ck20- for SMs, and Ck7-/ Ck20+ for adenocarcinomas) and the negativity for BerEP4 and CD15 epitopes of SMs, could be relevant for the distinction between SMs and metastatic adenocarcinomas.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]