MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II in growth hormone deficiency.
Author: Belgorosky A, Rivarola MA.
Journal: Horm Res; 1999; 52(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 10681634.
Abstract:
In blood, circulating IGFs are bound to six high-affinity IGFBPs, which modulate IGF delivery to target cells. Serum IGFs and IGFBP-3, the main carrier of IGFs, are upregulated by GH. The functional role of serum IGFBP-3-bound IGFs is not well understood, but they constitute the main reservoir of IGFs in the circulation. We have used an equation derived from the law of mass action to estimate serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II, as well as serum free IGF-I and free IGF-II, in 129 control children and adolescents (48 girls and 81 boys) and in 13 patients with GHD. Levels of serum total IGF-I, total IGF-II, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3 were determined experimentally, while those of IGFBP-4, IGFBP-5 and IGFPB-6, as well as the 12 affinity constants of association of the two IGFs with the six IGFBPs, were taken from published values. A correction for in vivo proteolysis of serum IGFBP-3 was also considered. In controls, serum total IGF-I, total IGF-II, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I, IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II and free IGF-I increased linearly with age, from less than 1 to 15 years, in the two sexes. The concentrations of serum free IGF-I and free IGF-II were approximately two orders of magnitude below published values, as well as below the affinity constant of association of IGF-I with the type-1 IGF receptor. Therefore, it is unlikely that these levels can interact with the receptor. In the 13 patients with GHD, mean (+/- SD) SDS of serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I was -2.89 +/- 0.97. It was significantly lower than serum total IGF-I, free IGF-I or IGFBP-3 SDSs (-2.35 +/- 0.83, -1.12 +/- 0.78 and -2.55 +/- 1.07, respectively, p = 0.0001). The mean SDS of serum total IGF-II, IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II and free IGF-II were -1.25 +/- 0.68, -2.03 +/- 0.87 and 0.59 +/- 1.10, respectively, in GHD. In control subjects, 89.8 +/- 4.47% of serum total IGF-I and 77.3 +/- 9.4% of serum total IGF-II were bound to serum IGFBP-3. In patients with GHD, the mean serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II were 8.63 +/- 8. 53 and 19.1 +/- 14.7% below the respective means of control subjects (p < 0.02). In conclusion, in GHD there was a relative change in the distribution of serum IGFs among IGFBPs, due to the combined effects of the decrease in both total IGF-I and IGFBP-3. As a result, serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3 bound IGF-II, the main reservoirs of serum IGFs, were severely affected. This suggests that the decrease in serum IGFPB-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II might have a negative effect for growth promotion and other biological effects of IGF-I and IGF-II. Finally, the estimation of serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I, or the percentage of total IGF-I and IGF-II bound to IGFBP-3, might be useful markers in the diagnosis of GHD.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]