These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion: a multicenter registry.
    Author: Lorch H, Welger D, Wagner V, Hillner B, Strecker EP, Herrmann H, Voshage G, Zur C, Schwarzbach C, Schröder J, Gullotta U, Pleissner J, Huttner S, Siering U, Märcklin C, Chavan A, Gläser F, Apitzsch DE, Moubayed K, Leonhardi J, Schuchard UM, Weiss HD, Zwaan M.
    Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 10693718.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the current practice of temporary vena cava filter placement and its complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter registry was conducted from May 1995 until May 1997 using a standardized questionnaire. One hundred eighty-eight patients were evaluated. Patient characteristics, filter indications, filter characteristics, and complications were registered. RESULTS: Deep vein thrombosis was proven in 95.2% of the patients. Main filter indication was thrombolysis therapy (53.1%). Average filter time was 5.4 days. An Antheor filter was inserted in 56.4%, a Guenther filter in 26.6%, and a Prolyser filter in 17.%. Transfemoral filter implantation was slightly preferred (54.8%). Four patients died of pulmonary embolism (PE) during filter protection. Major filter problems were filter thrombosis (16%) and filter dislocation (4.8%). When thrombus was found in or at the filter before explantation, additional thrombolysis was performed in 16.7%, additional filter implantation in 10%, and thrombus aspiration in 6.7%; 4.8% of filters were replaced with permanent filters. DISCUSSION: Temporary vena cava filters are placed to prevent PE in a defined patient population. Despite their presence, PEs still occur in a small percentage. Problems of filter thrombosis and dislocation have to be solved. CONCLUSION: The results of this multicenter registry support the need for innovative filter design, as well as a randomized, prospective study.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]