These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
    Author: Yang GC, Wan LS.
    Journal: J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To test whether the Tao Brush can retrieve sufficient endometrium for diagnosis and also to observe patients' tolerance of its use. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty women underwent Tao Brush sampling: 25 were sampled by Tao Brush alone, and the remainder were sampled by Pipelle immediately following. Patients' reactions to each method were observed. RESULTS: Pipelle currettes larger pieces of endometrium; the Tao Brush obtains smaller pieces. There was no discrepancy between Tao Brush and Pipelle except that Pipelle sampled two of five endometrial polyps, while the Tao Brush sampled none. There was less tissue insufficient for diagnosis with the Tao Brush (2%) than Pipelle (12%). Most patients did not show signs of distress during Tao Brush sampling but grimaced during Pipelle suction curettage. For each of the 16 patients in the second group, the Tao Brush was significantly less painful than Pipelle (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the Tao Brush is an effective alternative endometrial sampler, causes less pain and produces less tissue insufficient for diagnosis than does the Pipelle. The CPT billing codes (58100) are the same for both the Pipelle and Tao Brush.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]