These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.
    Author: Nguyen NT, Schauer P, Luketich JD.
    Journal: Surgery; 2000 Mar; 127(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 10715983.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia (BE/HGD) is associated with invasive carcinoma in 30% to 70% of cases. Esophagectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with BE/HGD but esophagectomy can be associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to report our preliminary experience in applying minimally invasive surgical techniques to esophagectomy for BE/HGD. METHODS: From August 1996 to February 1999, 12 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for biopsy-proven BE/HGD. Our consort consisted of 7 men and 5 women; average age was 64 years (range, 40-78 years). All patients underwent a complete laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic resection of the esophagus with cervical anastomosis. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 7.8 +/- 2.1 hours, mean intensive care unit stay was 2.6 +/- 2.2 days, and mean length of hospital stay was 8.3 +/- 4.7 days. Five patients (42%) had carcinoma in situ or carcinoma identified on pathologic specimen. Analyses of all resected lymph nodes in the 12 patients were negative for metastatic disease. There were 6 major complications in 5 patients: 1 patient had a small bowel perforation requiring operative repair, 2 patients needed prolonged ventilatory support for respiratory insufficiency, and 3 patients had delayed gastric emptying requiring revision of the pyloromyotomy. The single minor complication in this series was a jejunostomy tube-site infection. There were no conversions to laparotomy or thoracotomy. All patients were alive and free of metastatic disease at a mean follow-up of 12.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional open esophagectomy for patients with BE/HGD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]