These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [The role of local surgical and radiological control in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma sensitive to chemotherapy in children. Report of Polish Pediatric Solid Tumors Treatment Group]. Author: Kazanowska B, Jaworski W, Godziński J, Jeleń M, Turkiewicz D, Toporski J, Armata J, Balcerska A, Drozyńska E, Kołecki P, Liebhart M, Melanowska J, Nowak T, Rokicka-Milewska R, Skotnicka G, Sopyło B, Wysocki M. Journal: Wiad Lek; 1998; 51 Suppl 4():79-87. PubMed ID: 10731948. Abstract: In this paper the role local surgical and radiological control in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in children was analyzed. All children were treated according to CWS-91 and SIOP-IV protocols. Eighty three children with RMS A + E, EES/PNET, SS, UDS were included in the analysis. The primary surgery consisted of R0 (5%), R1 (18%) or R2 (16%) resection. In majority of cases (61%) primary surgical intervention was limited to diagnostic biopsy. Conventional or hyperfractionated radiotherapy was performed in 42.8%, 73.8% and 75% of children with disease stage II, III and IV, respectively. Delayed surgery was performed in 20 out of 53 (37.7%) children with stage III of the disease. In 5 patients without primary focus (urinary bladder in 3 and prostate in 2 cases) removed, progression of the disease occurred. In 5 children (stage IV) with progression of the disease no secondary surgery was performed. In 4 of them the primary tumor exceeded 10 cm in diameter. No delayed surgery was performed in 69% of relapsed children with stage III of the disease. Planned radiation therapy was not performed in 15.9% of cases. Primary local surgical control of primary tumor is of great importance for remission duration. In children who underwent delayed surgery the estimated EFS was of 0.7, in comparison with 0.5 EFS of those without secondary surgical treatment.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]