These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reverse gyrase, the two domains intimately cooperate to promote positive supercoiling.
    Author: Déclais AC, Marsault J, Confalonieri F, de La Tour CB, Duguet M.
    Journal: J Biol Chem; 2000 Jun 30; 275(26):19498-504. PubMed ID: 10748189.
    Abstract:
    Reverse gyrases are atypical topoisomerases present in hyperthermophiles and are able to positively supercoil a circular DNA. Despite a number of studies, the mechanism by which they perform this peculiar activity is still unclear. Sequence data suggested that reverse gyrases are composed of two putative domains, a helicase-like and a topoisomerase I, usually in a single polypeptide. Based on these predictions, we have separately expressed the putative domains and the full-length polypeptide of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius reverse gyrase as recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. We show the following. (i) The full-length recombinant enzyme sustains ATP-dependent positive supercoiling as efficiently as the wild type reverse gyrase. (ii) The topoisomerase domain exhibits a DNA relaxation activity by itself, although relatively low. (iii) We failed to detect helicase activity for both the N-terminal domain and the full-length reverse gyrase. (iv) Simple mixing of the two domains reconstitutes positive supercoiling activity at 75 degrees C. The cooperation between the domains seems specific, as the topoisomerase domain cannot be replaced by another thermophilic topoisomerase I, and the helicase-like cannot be replaced by a true helicase. (v) The helicase-like domain is not capable of promoting stoichiometric DNA unwinding by itself; like the supercoiling activity, unwinding requires the cooperation of both domains, either separately expressed or in a single polypeptide. However, unwinding occurs in the absence of ATP and DNA cleavage, indicating a structural effect upon binding to DNA. These results suggest that the N-terminal domain does not directly unwind DNA but acts more likely by driving ATP-dependent conformational changes within the whole enzyme, reminiscent of a protein motor.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]