These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy to complement vaginal operations for cervical and endometrial cancer.
    Author: Massi G, Susini T, Amunni G.
    Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Apr; 69(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 10760529.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to test the applicability of a personal modification of Mitra extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in combination with radical vaginal operations for treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. METHOD: In a prospective series, 82 patients were submitted to extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy. In 34 cases of stage I endometrial cancer the procedure was combined with a class I vaginal hysterectomy and in 48 cases of cervical cancer stage Ib-IIIb lymphadenectomy was associated with a class II or III radical vaginal hysterectomy. Type of anesthesia, number of lymph nodes removed, operating time, blood loss and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULT: The operation was performed with spinal anesthesia in 43% of the cases. Thirty-seven patients (45%) were high surgical risk because of associated diseases. The median operative time for lymphadenectomy was 20 min for each side; the vaginal procedures took a median of 25 min (class I) and 40 min (class II-III). Blood transfusions were necessary in seven cases (8. 5%). A median of 26 lymph nodes were removed from each patient. Lymphocyst occurred in seven patients (8.5%), retroperitoneal hematoma in two and retroperitoneal abscess in one. CONCLUSION: Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy has proven to be a safe and quick technique to complement vaginal operations for endometrial and cervical cancer. Specific features of this approach are: (1) fast, timesaving procedure; (2) possible use of spinal anesthesia; and (3) applicability in high surgical risk patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]