These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of load on the coordination of the trunk for subjects with and without chronic low back pain during flexion-extension and lateral bending tasks.
    Author: Larivière C, Gagnon D, Loisel P.
    Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Jul; 15(6):407-16. PubMed ID: 10771119.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if patients move their trunk sections differently than normal subjects and to determine if these differences increase when lifting a load. DESIGN: Comparative study using a repeated measures design. BACKGROUND: Many studies demonstrate a modification of the lumbar-pelvic rhythm for chronic low back pain patients but the large variability of the results impair the discrimination power. It was hypothesized that the lifting of a load would magnify the manifestation of lumbar impairments. METHODS: Fifteen chronic low back pain patients and 18 normal subjects performed maximal flexion-extension and lateral bending of the trunk with and without a 12 kg load. The pelvic, lumbar and thoracic motions were measured with a motion analysis system. RESULTS: During flexion-extension tasks, a significant decrease in lumbar flexion and increase in thoracic flexion were observed for the patients. The load effect was significant for all trunk sections but did not allow a better discrimination between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lifting a 12 kg load during flexion-extension of the trunk did confirm alteration in trunk section coordination but did not help to better discriminate patients from normal subjects. However, it was demonstrated for the first time that chronic low back pain patients compensate for a loss of lumbar flexion by increasing their thoracic flexion. RELEVANCE: The lumbar-pelvic rhythm is routinely used to evaluate low back impairments. The use of kinematic measures enhance the objectivity of the examination but the large variability of the results impair the discrimination power. Lifting a load during such an evaluation might magnify the low back impairments and increase the discrimination power of this measure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]