These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of cellactose with two ad hoc processed lactose-cellulose blends as direct compression excipients.
    Author: Casalderrey M, Souto C, Concheiro A, Gómez-Amoza JL, Martínez-Pacheco R.
    Journal: Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2000 Apr; 48(4):458-63. PubMed ID: 10783061.
    Abstract:
    Three processed lactose-cellulose blends of similar composition, particle size and true density were compared as direct compression excipients: one was prepared by dry granulation, one by extrusion-spheronization, and the commercial product Cellactose. Differences among their flow properties depended solely on their different sphericities. Unlike those of the other blends, Cellactose particles exhibited numerous macropores. The mean yield pressures of all three blends were similar to those of direct compression lactoses. Cellactose tablets prepared at a punch pressure that largely eliminated macropores (pores >1 microm) had better mechanical properties but much poorer disintegration than tablets of the other blends prepared at the same punch pressure. However, the tensile strength and disintegration time of Cellactose tablets both fell rapidly as macropore volume was increased by reducing punch pressure, while the enthalpy of wetting/dissolution rose. The strength and water-resistance of well-compacted Cellactose tablets is attributed to the spatial distribution of lactose and cellulose in Cellactose particles, rather than to beta-lactose content or extra-particular structural features.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]