These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: A bench-top method for evaluating modular total hip component combinations.
    Author: Uhl RL, Williamson SC, Williams R, Andrews W, Hutchison J.
    Journal: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Apr; 29(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 10784019.
    Abstract:
    A modular total hip prosthesis allows the surgeon to vary head size, neck length, and acetabular coverage. Different combinations, however, may increase the risk of impingement of the prosthesis neck on the acetabular liner, leading to dislocation. We developed a bench-top model to test different modular component combinations to determine how far the femoral component could travel within the acetabular liner before impingement led to dislocation. We tested two hip systems, each from a different manufacturer. Certain components increased the risk of impingement and dislocation: skirted necks, smaller heads, and lipped liners. While the contribution of each component was small, the risk was additive, so that the combination of a small head with a skirted neck in a lipped liner actually reduced the available range of motion by 18 degrees, from 146 degrees to 128 degrees, in the first system, and by 13 degrees, from 156 degrees to 143 degrees in the other. This method could be adapted to test a wide range of component configurations, from a number of manufacturers. These findings may be useful in avoiding potentially unstable configurations when given a choice of modular components.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]