These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Gastric stromal tumors. Findings with computerized tomography].
    Author: Ferrozzi F, Tognini G, Zuccoli G, Gabrielli M, Zangrandi A, Campani R.
    Journal: Radiol Med; 2000; 99(1-2):56-61. PubMed ID: 10803188.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Gastric stromal tumors are an ill-defined group of lesions arising from muscle wall cells and characterized by extremely variable biological patterns. Thanks to modern immunohistochemical and ultrastructural techniques, four main classes of these lesions have been identified, namely: 1) tumors with differentiation toward smooth muscle cells; 2) tumors with differentiation toward neural elements; 3) tumors with dual differentiation toward both cell types; 4) tumors lacking differentiation toward either cell type. We investigated the yield of CT in diagnosing and characterizing gastric stromal tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the CT findings of 38 patients (15 men and 23 women; mean age 51 years) with pathologically proven gastric stromal tumors, namely 31 of myoid origin, 4 of neural origin, 2 with both muscle and neural differentiation, 1 lacking differentiation with either cell type. Morphological (size, margins, growth pattern, enlarged lymph nodes, metastases) and structural (density, calcifications, necrosis, cystic changes, enhancement patterns) parameters were evaluated and compared with histopathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: The myoid tumors involved gastric fundus in 9/13 and 5/7 benign lesions and lesions with variable biological patterns, respectively, while the malignant tumors exhibited diffuse involvement in 7/11 of cases. Eleven of 13 benign lesions had regular shape and a diameter +/- 5 cm, while 5/7 intermediate tumors and 7/11 malignant ones were 6-10 cm and over 10 cm (1/7 and 3/11, respectively). Tumor growth was intramural (6/13) or mixed (5/13) in the benign lesions, mainly exophytic in the malignant ones, and finally variable (2/7 intramural, 3/7 exophytic and 2/7 mixed) in the tumors with intermediate patterns. Calcifications were identified only in 3 benign lesions. Structure was homogeneous in 11/13 of the benign lesions with regular contrast enhancement (10/12), heterogeneous due to necrotic areas in nearly all (10/11) or most (5/7) malignant and intermediate forms, respectively. Enlarged lymph nodes (4/11) or synchronous metastases (7/11) were found in the malignant lesions. Our two schwannomas had a pseudocystic structure with regular peripheral contrast enhancement; the neurofibroma was characterized by multiple, markedly hypodense and hypovascular lesions. Both the malignant neurogen form and the two tumors with dual differentiation showed a diffuse, aspecific and infiltrating pattern. The lesion without differentiation had a "benign" shape and structure even though it developed metastases two years after radical surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of specificity of CT patterns of gastric stromal tumors, these parameters are useful in differentiating benign from overtly malignant forms. The definition "gastric stromal tumor with benign, variable, or malignant macroscopic appearance" should be used in the radiologic report.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]