These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Usefulness of rapid bedside cardiac troponin T assay for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction].
    Author: Ogawa M, Abe S, Saigo M, Kozono T, Yamaguchi K, Toda H, Lee S, Yamashita T, Atsuchi Y, Tateishi S, Tahara M, Torii H, Akimoto M, Mawatari K, Fukusaki M, Tei C.
    Journal: J Cardiol; 2000 Mar; 35(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 10808422.
    Abstract:
    Cardiac troponin T(cTnT) is one of the most myocardial-specific markers for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Recently, the rapid bedside cTnT assay(Trop T rapid assay sensitive version), which can provide qualitative determinations within 15 min, has been developed for the emergency clinical setting. To evaluate the usefulness of rapid bedside cTnT assay, we performed the Trop T test and measured serum levels of myoglobin(Mb), creatine kinase MB isoenzyme(CK-MB) and cTnT in 256 consecutive emergency patients with suspected AMI(65 found to have AMI and 191 without AMI). The diagnostic sensitivities for AMI of Trop T, Mb and CK-MB measurements were 66%, 92% and 52%, respectively, whereas the specificities were 80%, 18% and 74%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for AMI of Trop T(77%) was significantly higher than that of Mb(37%, p < 0.001) and CK-MB(69%, p < 0.05). The sensitivity for AMI of Mb(86%) was significantly(p < 0.001) higher than that of Trop T (31%) and CK-MB(31%) in patients admitted < or = 3 hr after the onset of AMI. In contrast, the sensitivities of Trop T(80% and 100%) in patients admitted at 3-6 hr and > 6 hr showed no significant differences from those of Mb(100% and 96%). Furthermore, Trop T in patients admitted > 6 hr had significantly(p < 0.01) higher sensitivity compared with CK-MB(69%). The mortality rate in the non-AMI group during hospitalization in patients with positive Trop T test(39%) was significantly(p < 0.001) higher than that in patients with negative test(9%). When the positive Trop T test was regarded as > or = 0.10 ng/ml of serum cTnT, Trop T test had the best concordance of 92% with a quantitative of cTnT assay.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]