These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diminution of the anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate response to a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine by concurrent inactivated poliovirus vaccination.
    Author: Rennels MB, Englund JA, Bernstein DI, Losonsky GA, Anderson EL, Pichichero ME, Munoz FM, Wolff MC.
    Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2000 May; 19(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 10819337.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Prelicensure studies of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines (Hib) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines (DTaP) were evaluated with concurrent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). However, inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is now recommended. A trial was conducted in which infants received a DTaP and Hib vaccine, separately (+) or combined (/), with either all OPV, all IPV or sequential IPV-OPV for the primary series of vaccinations. METHODS: In this protocol 567 infants were equally randomized to receive one of the following: Reference Arm A, DTaP + Hib + OPV; Treatment Arm B, DTaP/Hib + OPV; Treatment Arm C, DTaP/Hib + IPV at 2 and 4 months and OPV at 6 months; or Treatment Arm D, DTaP/Hib + IPV. antibodies against all administered antigens were measured at 7 months of age. Children with an antibody response to Hib (anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (anti-PRP) <0.15 microg/ml had an antibody titer repeated after the toddler booster immunization. RESULTS: A significant diminution in the anti-PRP response was observed at 7 months of age in children given two or three doses of IPV concurrently with DTaP/Hib, compared with the groups given OPV. The geometric mean concentration of anti-PRP, percentage of children with > or = 0.15 microg/ml and percentage of children with > or = 1.0 microg/ ml, respectively, were: A, 4.4, 98%, 81%; B, 3.2, 94%, 78%; C, 1.3, 86%, 58% and D, 1.2, 84%, 53%. CONCLUSION: In this trial concurrent IPV appeared to interfere with the anti-PRP response to DTaP/Hib vaccine, suggesting that introduction of new vaccines may require evaluation of immune responses to all concurrently administered vaccines.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]