These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of methods of measurements of oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients with multiple trauma: the Fick method versus indirect calorimetry.
    Author: Epstein CD, Peerless JR, Martin JE, Malangoni MA.
    Journal: Crit Care Med; 2000 May; 28(5):1363-9. PubMed ID: 10834679.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the measurements of whole body oxygen consumption determined by the Fick method and by indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients with multiple trauma. DESIGN: A prospective, correlational, within-subjects design. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight mechanically ventilated adults with multiple injuries who received a pulmonary artery catheter within 24 hrs of admission to the surgical intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After the initial resuscitation, simultaneous measurements of oxygen consumption (V(O2) by the reverse Fick equation and by indirect calorimetry were performed every 6 hrs for 24 hrs in normothermic patients who were at rest for at least 30 mins. At each measurement period, the mean V(O2) values determined by indirect calorimetry were significantly greater than the mean V(O2) values determined by the Fick method (time 1: 172+/-38 vs. 125+/-47 mL/min/m2, p < .0001; time 2: 170+/-31 vs. 130+/-48 mL/min/m2, p < .0001; time 3: 170+/-32 vs. 132+/-53 mL/min/m2, p < .0001; time 4: 169+/-29 vs. 130+/-60 mL/min/m2, p < .0002). By using the Bland and Altman technique, the mean bias was 41+/-3.95 mL/min/m2. Correlation coefficients of VO2 values between methods of measurements were statistically significant (r2 = .32, p = .0001; r2 = .32, p = .0001; r2 = .33, p = .0001; r2 = .18, p = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Indirect calorimetry should be the preferred standard for measurement of oxygen consumption in severely injured patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]