MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Mycophenolate mofetil for prevention of liver allograft rejection: initial results of a controlled clinical trial.
Author: Sterneck M, Fischer L, Gahlemann C, Gundlach M, Rogiers X, Broelsch C.
Journal: Ann Transplant; 2000; 5(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 10850611.
Abstract:
UNLABELLED: Mycophenolate Mofetil (M MF) is a new immunosuppressive agent with proven efficacy for the prevention of kidney allograft rejection. However, only little experience is available with the use of MMF in liver transplant recipients. OBJECTIVES: In this prospective, controlled trial the efficacy and safety of MMF and Azathioprine (AZA) were compared in a Neoral based quadruple immunosuppressive regimen after orthotopic liver transplantation. METHODS: Between 12/96 and 12/98 57 adult patients were enrolled in the study at the University of Hamburg. 28 patients were randomised to MMF, 29 patients to AZA in combination with equivalent doses of lymphocyte antibodies, Neoral and methylprednisolone. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 10+/-3.2 months patient or graft survival did not differ significantly between the MMF and AZA group. However, MMF treated patients experienced less frequently acute rejection episodes (MMF: 6/28; 21.4% versus AZA: 13/29; 44.8%) (p=0.06). Furthermore, thrombocytopenia (MMF: 6/28; 21.4% versus AZA: 14/29; 48.3%) (p<0.05) and leukopenia (MMF: 2/28; 7.1% versus AZA: 6/29; 20%) (p=0.14) were less often observed under MMF compared to AZA. The incidence of serious bacterial infections and cytomegalovirus infections was almost identical in both groups. These preliminary data suggest that after liver transplantation primary immunosuppression with MMF is advantageous over AZA with regard to safety and efficacy.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]