These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading.
    Author: Lotz JC, Chin JR.
    Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun 15; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 10851095.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo study of the toxic consequences of static compressive stress on the intervertebral disc. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether disc cell death is correlated with the magnitude and duration of spinal compressive loading. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Static compression in vivo has been demonstrated to induce cell death. Cell death, in turn, has been associated with disc degeneration in humans. There are currently no tolerance criteria for the intervertebral disc that combine both biomechanical and biologic factors, although both have been implicated in cases of accelerated degeneration. METHODS: Mouse tail discs were loaded in vivo with an external compression device. Compressive stress was applied at one of two magnitudes (0.4 and 0.8 MPa) for 7 days, and at one additional magnitude (1.3 MPa) for 1, 3, and 7 days. Midsagittal sections of the discs were stained for apoptosis using the TdT-dUTP terminal nick-end labeling (TUNEL) reaction. Quantal analysis was used to correlate the extent of cell death to the magnitude and duration of loading. RESULTS: The probit transformation of the percentage of dying cells was proportional to the sum of the logarithmic transformations of the compressive stress and the time of loading. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of developing a quantitative correlation between spinal loading and disc degeneration. Such a correlation may be coupled in the future to existing engineering models that predict spinal loading in response to physical exposures and lead to improved definition of the bounds of healthy and unhealthy spinal loading, and ultimately, refined guidelines for low back safety.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]