These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of the potential therapeutic gain of p(66)/Be neutrons and d(14)/Be neutrons.
    Author: Slabbert JP, Theron T, Zolzer F, Streffer C, Bohm L.
    Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul 01; 47(4):1059-65. PubMed ID: 10863079.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between photon sensitivity and neutron sensitivity and between neutron RBE and photon resistance for two neutron modalities (with mean energies of 6 and 29 MeV) using human tumor cell lines spanning a wide range of radiosensitivities, the principal objective being whether or not a neutron advantage can be demonstrated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven human tumor cell lines with mean photon inactivation doses of 1.65-4. 35 Gy were irradiated with 0-5.0 Gy of p(66)/Be neutrons (mean energy of 29 MeV) at Faure, S.A. and the same plating was irradiated on the same day with 0-10.0 Gy of Cobalt-gamma-rays. Twelve human tumor cell lines, many of which were identical with the above selection, and spanning mean photon inactivation doses of 1.75-4.08 Gy, were irradiated with 0-4 Gy of d(14)/Be neutrons (mean energy of 6 MeV) and with 0-10 Gy of 240 kVp X-rays at the Essen Klinikum. Cell survival was determined by the clonogenic assay, and data were fitted to the linear quadratic equation. RESULTS: 1. Using the mean inactivation dose, a significant correlation was found to exist between neutron sensitivity and photon sensitivity. However, this correlation was more pronounced in the Faure beam (r(2) = 0.89, p </= 0.0001) than in the Essen beam (r(2) = 0.65, p = 0.0027). 2. No significant relationship could be established between neutron RBE and photon resistance for both modalities (p = 0.69 and p = 0.07, respectively). 3. Using alpha-coefficients as a criterion, the neutron sensitivity for the Faure beam correlated with photon sensitivity (p = 0.001), but this did not apply to the Essen beam (p = 0.27). 4. The neutron RBE for the Essen beam derived from alpha-coefficients showed a steep increase with photon resistance (p = 0.003). In the Faure beam there was no increase of RBE with photon resistance (p = 0.494). CONCLUSION: Radiobiological differences between high-energy and low-energy neutrons are particularly apparent in the dependence of the neutron RBE on photon sensitivity. The increase of RBE with photon resistance is more pronounced in the low-energy Essen neutrons than in the high-energy Faure neutrons. An RBE advantage is indicated for photon-resistant cell lines and this is particularly apparent in the low-dose range using alpha-coefficients as compared to the mean inactivation dose. The clinical application of low-energy neutrons may be more restricted because of poor penetration and lack of skin sparing. However, these neutrons discriminate better between photon-sensitive and photon-resistant cells giving an RBE range of 2-6 and a mean RBE of 4.1, than high-energy neutrons where the RBE range is 1.6-3.5 and the mean RBE is 2.4. From the radiobiological point of view it, therefore, appears that the clinical potential of low-energy neutrons is considerably underrated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]