These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Idiopathic right ventricular tachycardia or arrhythmogenic right ventricular tachycardia?].
    Author: Kuhn A, Kottkamp H, Thiele H, Schuler G, Hindricks G.
    Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jun 02; 125(22):692-7. PubMed ID: 10874896.
    Abstract:
    HISTORY: While cycling a 38-year-old man suddenly experienced palpitations associated with marked weakness. 90 min later his general practitioner, having diagnosed a ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a rate of 218/min, terminated it by a drug injection. INVESTIGATIONS: Electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography and biventricular cardiac catheterization with right ventricular contrast injection failed to provide any evidence of structural abnormality. However, ergometry and EPS with programmed ventricular stimulation induced VT of identical morphology (left bundle branch bloc [LBBB] with right axis deviation [RAD]). TREATMENT AND COURSE: Idiopathic right-ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (IRVT) having been diagnosed, the patient was put on a maintenance dose of 50 mg/d atenolol. After 6 months without symptoms he again experienced several attacks of tachycardia. Resting ECG merely revealed an epsilon potential and negative T waves in V1-V3. Right ventricular contrast injection revealed inferolateral dyskinesia. EPS demonstrated both the known VT and a second, morphologically different one (LBBB with LAD). These findings indicated arrhythmogenic right-ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARCV). A cardioverter/defibrillator was implanted (ICD) and over the subsequent 8 months he had six episodes of VT which were quickly terminated by the ICD. CONCLUSION: At first presentation of right-ventricular outflow tract tachycardia it is often not possible to differentiate between IRVT and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy. The two being significantly different in prognosis and treatment, follow-up monitoring is essential to establish the definitive diagnosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]