These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of inflammatory responses to genetically engineered hypoallergenic derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen bet v 1 and to recombinant bet v 1 wild type in skin chamber fluids collected from birch pollen-allergic patients.
    Author: Nopp A, Halldén G, Lundahl J, Johansson E, Vrtala S, Valenta R, Grönneberg R, Van Hage-Hamsten M.
    Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2000 Jul; 106(1 Pt 1):101-9. PubMed ID: 10887312.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Nearly 60% of birch pollen-allergic patients react exclusively to Bet v 1. With use of the skin blister model, previously only established for installation of crude allergens, we have for the first time characterized the inflammatory response in vivo to recombinant birch pollen allergen, rBet v 1, molecules (rBet v 1 wild type, fragments and trimer). OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine whether challenge with rBet v 1 derivatives (fragments and trimer) compared with rBet v 1 wild type differs with respect to influx of activated eosinophils and detectable levels of cytokines/chemokines related to allergic inflammation in skin chambers applied to birch pollen-allergic patients. METHODS: The skin blister chambers were filled for 2 hours with rBet v 1, the derivatives or PBS and heparin (negative control). The fluids were analyzed after 2 and 8 hours. The number of eosinophils was determined and EG2 and CD69 expression measured by flow cytometry. Cytokines and mediators were analyzed by ELISA and RIA techniques. RESULTS: Comparable numbers of eosinophils were recruited to the chambers challenged with rBet v 1 molecules, but the eosinophils from the rBet v 1 wild-type challenged chambers showed a significantly higher expression of CD69. The levels of eotaxin were similar in all 4 chambers, whereas rBet v 1 wild type induced significantly higher levels of histamine, eosinophil cationic protein, and GM-CSF than the derivatives did. Recombinant Bet v 1 trimer elicited significantly lower levels of IL-4 compared with rBet v1 wild type. CONCLUSION: Genetically engineered hypoallergenic rBet v 1 derivatives recruited eosinophils analogously with rBet v 1 wild type. However, the derivatives exhibited a lower capacity to activate eosinophils and to release proinflammatory mediators and T helper type 2-derived cytokines. The derivatives may therefore be candidate molecules for specific immunotherapy of birch pollen allergy with reduced risk of inducing allergenic or inflammatory side effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]