These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Author: Mykén P, Bech-Hanssen O, Phipps B, Caidahl K. Journal: J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100. Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIM OF STUDY: The study aim was to review the 15-year results of aortic (AVR) and mitral (MVR) valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine prosthesis, in order to investigate long-term survival and valve-related complications. METHODS: Between January 1983 and January 1998, a total of 1,187 patients underwent either AVR (n = 1,029; mean age 69 years) or MVR (n = 158; mean age 63 years). Follow up (99.7% complete) was monitored in 1998, and all data were analyzed with regard to actuarial valve failure rates. Long-term echocardiographic data were obtained. RESULTS: Cumulative follow up time was 5,049 patient-years (pt-yr) for AVR patients, and 845 pt-yr for MVR patients. Actuarial survival rate at 15 years was 41 +/- 3%, and freedom from valve-related death was 94 +/- 1% for the AVR group; corresponding values for the MVR group were 25 +/- 11% and 84 +/- 6%. The occurrence of structural valve deterioration (SVD) varied with age; older patients were less affected. Freedom from SVD was 76 +/- 7% and 92 +/- 4% for AVR and MVR patients, respectively. Thromboembolism (TE) occurred mainly among the oldest patients, and was most prevalent among those with MVR. Actuarial freedom from TE was 82 +/- 5% after AVR and 75 +/- 7% after MVR. Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) was rare, but caused the only reoperative mortality. Freedom from PVE was 95 +/- 2% after AVR and 93 +/- 3% after MVR. CONCLUSION: Although the optimal valve substitute remains to be found, this long-term study of a third-generation bioprosthesis showed a low incidence of valve-related complications, especially of valve deterioration. This type of bioprosthesis appears to be more durable than valves of previous generations.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]