These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Plasma VEGF and soluble VEGF receptor FLT-1 in proliferative retinopathy: relationship to endothelial dysfunction and laser treatment.
    Author: Lip PL, Belgore F, Blann AD, Hope-Ross MW, Gibson JM, Lip GY.
    Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2115-9. PubMed ID: 10892852.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To study plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, an index of angiogenesis), its soluble receptor (sFlt-1) and von Willebrand factor (vWf, an index of endothelial damage or dysfunction) in patients with proliferative retinopathy and corresponding changes in plasma levels after pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP). METHODS: Eighteen patients (10 men; age, 57+/-16 years, mean +/- SD) with proliferative retinopathy secondary to diabetes (n = 13) and ischemic retinal vein occlusion (n = 5) with no previous PRP therapy were studied. Blood samples were obtained before and at 4 months after the last PRP session. Baseline (prelaser) plasma levels of VEGF, sFlt-1, and vWf (all by ELISA) were compared with levels in 16 diabetic patients with background retinopathy ("hospital controls"), and 18 healthy, age- and sex-matched "healthy controls." RESULTS: Patients with proliferative retinopathy had significantly raised plasma VEGF when compared with both control groups (P = 0.001). Patients with proliferative retinopathy and hospital controls had significantly raised plasma vWf levels when compared with healthy controls (P = 0.012). There was no difference in sFlt-1 levels between patients and controls (P = 0.162). After PRP, there was a significant reduction in plasma VEGF levels at 4 months' follow-up (P < 0.001), but no significant changes in plasma sFlt-1 or vWf levels. Patients with complete resolution of neovascularization had a trend toward lower median VEGF levels (80 versus 150 pg/ml, P = 0.062), but vWf levels (P = 0.50) and sFlt-1 (P = 0.479) were not statistically different. Baseline VEGF and sFlt-1 levels were significantly correlated (Spearman r = 0.505, P = 0.032) but after PRP at 4 months' follow-up, this was no longer significant (r = -0.269, P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, patients with proliferative retinopathy demonstrate elevated peripheral markers of angiogenesis and endothelial dysfunction, suggesting a role for these processes in the pathogenesis of this condition. A fall in levels of VEGF after successful laser treatment may provide an opportunity for monitoring disease progression or relapse via a blood sample.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]