These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interpretation of calcaneus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the assessment of osteopenia and fracture risk.
    Author: Wren TA, Yerby SA, Beaupré GS, Carter DR.
    Journal: J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Aug; 15(8):1573-8. PubMed ID: 10934656.
    Abstract:
    Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus is useful in assessing bone mass and fracture risk at other skeletal sites. However, DXA yields an areal bone mineral density (BMD) that depends on both bone apparent density and bone size, potentially complicating interpretation of the DXA results. Information that is more complete may be obtained from DXA exams by using a volumetric density in addition to BMD in clinical applications. In this paper, we develop a simple methodology for determining a volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) of the calcaneus. For the whole calcaneus, BMAD = (BMC)/ADXA3/2, where BMC and ADXA are, respectively, the bone mineral content and projected area measured by DXA. We found that ADXA3/2 was proportional to the calcaneus volume with a proportionality constant of 1.82 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- SE). Consequently, consistent with theoretical predictions, BMAD was proportional to the true volumetric apparent density (rho) of the bone according to the relationship rho = 1.82 BMAD. Also consistent with theoretical predictions, we found that BMD varied in proportion to rho V1/3, where V is the bone volume. We propose that the volumetric apparent density, estimated at the calcaneus, provides additional information that may aid in the diagnosis of osteopenia. Areal BMD or BMD2 may allow estimation of the load required to fracture a bone. Fracture risk depends on the loading applied to a bone in relation to the bone's failure load. When DXA is used to assess osteopenia and fracture risk in patients, it may be useful to recognize the separate and combined effects of applied loading, bone apparent density, and bone size.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]