These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Multiple molecular marker testing (p53, C-Ki-ras, c-erbB-2) improves estimation of prognosis in potentially curative resected non-small cell lung cancer.
    Author: Schneider PM, Praeuer HW, Stoeltzing O, Boehm J, Manning J, Metzger R, Fink U, Wegerer S, Hoelscher AH, Roth JA.
    Journal: Br J Cancer; 2000 Aug; 83(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 10945494.
    Abstract:
    A prospective study was performed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate the prognostic importance of multiple molecular marker (p53, c-Ki-ras, c-erbB-2) testing. 103 patients with potentially curative resections (RO resection) for NSCLC in histopathological stages I-IIIA were included. SSCP analysis and DNA sequencing for p53 and c-Ki-ras genes were performed on paired tumour and normal lung tissue samples and immunohistochemistry (c-erbB-2) was done on frozen tissue sections with a specific anti-c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody. 46/103 (44.6%) NSCLC showed p53 mutations and 17/103 (16.5%) c-Ki-ras mutations including 12/37 (32.4%) adenocarcinomas. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 (p185) was detected in 56/103 (54.4%) tumours. 24/103 (23.3%) NSCLC were negative for alterations in all 3 parameters (c-Ki-ras, p53 and p185) whereas 79/103 (76.7%) were positive for at least one of the 3 parameters. In a regression model including a multiple molecular marker parameter (negative for all 3 markers versus positive for at least one marker), histopathological stage (P<0.00001), respectively the pT (P<0.01) and pN (P<0.00001) categories and the multiple molecular marker parameter (P<0.01) were of significant prognostic importance. This study demonstrates that testing 3 molecular markers (c-Ki-ras, p53 and c-erbB-2) improves estimation of prognosis compared to single marker testing and appears to define low (82.6%+/-7.9% 5-year survival) and high risk (40.2%+/-5.5% 5-year survival) groups for treatment failure in potentially curative (RO) resected NSCLC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]