These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predicting outcome of angioplasty and selective stenting of multisegment iliac artery occlusive disease.
    Author: Powell RJ, Fillinger M, Walsh DB, Zwolak R, Cronenwett JL.
    Journal: J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):564-9. PubMed ID: 10957665.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Patients who require angioplasty and stenting of multiple iliac arterial segments often require reintervention to maintain long-term patency. Morphologic predictors and causes of failure are unknown. The purpose of the current study was to define arteriographic predictors of angioplasty and selective stent failure in the treatment of multisegment iliac occlusive disease. METHODS: All iliac segments (two common and two external) of 75 patients who underwent angioplasty and selective stent placement for multisegment iliac occlusive disease (>/= two segments) were scored through use of a modification of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology classification for iliac angioplasty (0 = no lesion; 4 = most severe). Total iliac score was calculated by summing scores from each segment. A separate external iliac score was calculated by adding only the external iliac scores. Arteriograms were reviewed initially and at the time of lesion recurrence and stratified by lesion location and previous intervention. RESULTS: The area of previous endovascular intervention was the site of recurrence in 75% of patients. New lesions, presumably a result of progressive atherosclerosis, occurred in 15% of patients, and lesions occurred in both new and previously treated iliac segments in 10% of patients. Only the external iliac score was an independent predictor of failed endovascular therapy despite reintervention. For patients with an external iliac score of 2 or less, the endovascular primary-assisted patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 96%, 92%, and 89%, respectively. This was improved in comparison with the 90%, 63%, and 45% patency rates observed in patients with an external iliac score of 3 or more (P =.001). Patients with an external iliac score of 3 or more had a significantly lower incidence of hemodynamic and clinical improvement after intervention and a threefold higher need for surgical inflow procedures than patients with an external iliac score of 2 or less. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion formation after treatment of multisegment iliac occlusive disease typically occurs in areas of prior intervention. The extent of external iliac disease can be used to stratify patients with multisegment iliac occlusive disease who will likely respond to endovascular treatment with a durable result. Patients with extensive external iliac disease (score >/= 3) have poor results after angioplasty and selective stenting as applied in this study, even with endovascular reintervention. They are ideal subjects for prospective comparative studies of competing initial therapies, including stenting, endografting, and aortobifemoral bypass grafting.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]