These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [The effect of cladribine treatment on beta-2 microglobin in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with multiple sclerosis]. Author: Niezgoda A, Losy J. Journal: Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2000; 34(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 10962721. Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most frequent demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Lymphocytes seem to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disorder. They are rich in, among others, beta-2Microglobulin (beta 2M)--a low molecular weight protein located extracellularly and associated with class 1 antigens of the major histocompatibility complex. beta-2M is considered as a marker for disease activity in immune disorders. Its precise role in pathology remains still unknown, but there is evidence that it may be involved in lymphocyte activation. Cladribine (2-chloro-2-deoxyadenosine, 2-CDA) is a potent lymphocytotoxic agent under investigation in the treatment in MS patients, earlier used in hairy-cell-leukemia therapy. Previous studies in MS populations showed beta 2-microglobulin to be moderately increased. Suspecting that beta 2M levels might indicate inflammatory events in CNS we determined CSF-beta 2M and serum beta 2M concentration in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (n = 15) before and after cladribine treatment as well as in a control group diagnosed as tension type headache (n = 10). There was a significant decrease in the CSF and sera beta 2M level in MS patients after cladribine treatment, associated with a slight but significant clinical improvement measured by Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale. We conclude that beta 2M is a sensitive marker of the CDA influence on the immune system in MS patients; however, increase in CSF and sera beta 2M is not specific as there was no statistically significant difference between MS and control patients.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]